Ãļ§Ö±²¥

Members expressed their satisfaction with Ãļ§Ö±²¥s current offer and organisation: we should be careful not to lose too much of our present quality. We can be proud of Ãļ§Ö±²¥ being a semi-professional organisation. We need to return to our basics and expand them.

Ãļ§Ö±²¥ started with archaeological open-air museums and we now have four legs, all revolving around these museums. These legs are experimental archaeology, archaeological open-air museums, ancient technology and interpretation. We are juggling many items and need to satisfy the needs of very different members. We need to explain better how the Ãļ§Ö±²¥ mosaic fits together. We can possibly be more active at linking people and museums (twinning).

Reaching out in person

Ãļ§Ö±²¥ has 250 members in 40 countries, mostly in Europe although our US presence is getting larger. It is a welcome challenge for Ãļ§Ö±²¥ to go worldwide.

Face-to-face contact and hands-on learning are more valuable than online opportunities. We have to meet people around the world and not just send printed matter and digital messages. There are, for example, large primitive technology events where Ãļ§Ö±²¥ could be present such as Rabbitstick in the USA.

In several countries (Italy, the UK and the Netherlands) we have enough members to start up a ‘national network of Ãļ§Ö±²¥ members’. It will be interesting to see how these develop. We could have national meetings of members on the shoulder of existing events, such as the Paleofestival in Italy.

Students & volunteers

Should Ãļ§Ö±²¥ approach students directly? Should we work more with volunteers? They should be included in the existing four legs. Ideas for the experimental archaeology conference EAC10 in Leiden in 2017 are similar to what we did in Dublin (EAC9) where students could learn how to present. We will also include breakout sessions. EAC10 will be a good opportunity to include people from the US too. 

Loose ideas

The Ãļ§Ö±²¥ members mentioned many loose ideas. We need to aim to include more videos on the Ãļ§Ö±²¥ website.

Open Access should be our standard and an important reason behind turning the bibliography into a repository. We intend to make the Journal fully Open Access.

The accreditation of archaeological open-air museums may be nice, but instead of being a snobbish controlling, it should be a tool to help museums improve. This idea has been mulled over in Ãļ§Ö±²¥ for over a decade and maybe we can develop it in the next few years to come.

Overall we heard several good ideas which we hope to realise in the near future. Comments from members and non-members are welcome at the secretariat (info@exarc.net)!